|
If you
followed us here from the previous week's article, you know
Cora had her head in the Renaissance era. My mission was to
extract her from knights and knaves and convince her to become
intrigued with foreign trade. I found the answer to this dilemma
when we visited the library during our week of penny pinching.
The book, Atlas
of American History, by Robert H. Ferrell and Richard
Natkiel, was the key for hours of painless learning, and a
great introduction to the physical realities of colonization,
trade, and political maneuvers.
Foreign
trade was based on politics and power, and many foreign trade
decisions were made before, during, and after times of war;
therefore, we have a perfect book to set the stage for the
noble plot of international trade. For your own edification,
try The
Economy of Colonial America by Edwin J. Perkins. The chapters
are short, and the bibliography is outstanding if you wish
to pursue this study further.
Oh - the
"noble" part was also a lure for Cora's interest. Cora soon
discovered it takes more than a good joust to make a person
noble. Nobility, such as the crowned heads in Europe during
the colonial period, set the stage for our current foreign
trade affairs. At that time, the Spanish and Portuguese were
out for precious metals and the British were out for land.
Land, in all its pristine and occupied glory, seemed ready
for the taking in the New World. Land, with all its trees,
animals, and fertility, was England's key to economic and
political power.
In the
1600s, the British operated under the economics of "mercantilism,"
a system much like Keynesian economics (see
May 21 article). Self reliance and a balance of international
trade was favored, since England was now in a position to
force other nations to settle deficit accounts with precious
metals - particularly gold. England gained this gold when
the export of goods exceeded the imports, creating debts to
the British crown. The colonists were expected to help England,
and the first colonial settlers tried their best to accommodate
these wishes.
The northern
colonies supplied furs and trees, which were in vast demand
overseas. England, along with a few other European nations,
developed a major financial problem with deforestation. A
lack of trees creates numerous issues, including the annihilation
of a home for wild animals. No animals meant available fur
for human warmth was at a premium. Along with a minimal amount
of trees came a dearth of sturdy pine masts for ships, a must-have
for transportation of goods and for defense in war. England
also required lumber for heating, household building materials,
and fuel for manufacturing iron.
Two of
the most important and interesting exports from northern colonies
to Britain were whale oil and potash. At that time, England
didn't have petroleum for lighting or for lubrication to finish
leather and make soap. Whale oil filled that bill. Potash
was made from tree ashes leached with water, producing a chemical
used in glass and soap manufacturing. We found this interesting
as both products are no longer needed, and this eventual lack
of demand created changes in the atmosphere of trade and in
the course of history.
Southern
colonies provided tobacco, hemp for rope and sails, rice,
and salted fish and meat. These products make for fascinating
reading, because - due to the course of politics and the development
of corporate innovations - the trade climate has changed for
both northern and southern colonial exports, including where
they're made or grown, how they're processed, and government
regulations involved in the gathering, packaging, and distribution
of these products.
Britain
accepted imports of all these goods and more for internal
consumption and for trade to other European countries for
almost two centuries. In exchange, Britain exported inexpensive
trade goods to Africa. As these ships unloaded their goods
in Africa, they refilled their hulls with slaves, gold dust,
and pepper to distribute in the Caribbean. Once the ships
unloaded most of their cargo in the islands, they gathered
sugar, rum and molasses for the colonies. Britain also exported
indentured servants to the colonies for a time. Manufactured
goods also made their way to the New World, but demand for
these items decreased once the colonists found ways to support
themselves.
Britain
faced a major problem when the colonists became so self-reliant
they no longer needed imports from the mother country. Most
imported products were eventually considered luxuries, not
necessities, to the colonial settlers. In response to this
predicament, Britain began to enforce rules on the game of
international trade. These rules, supposedly, would inhibit
the colonies from becoming rivals in the new world economy.
One of
the first colonial enterprises affected by Britain's new regulations
was the hat industry, notably fur hats created by manufacturers
in the Hudson River Valley. British hatters became quite incensed
(mad hatters?) over the fur hat craze that swept London and
beyond, because these colonial hatters had captured the market
with a symbol representing the unknown wilderness, bravery,
and relief from poverty through industrious individual enterprise.
The British hatters convinced Parliament to pass the 1792
Hat Act, prohibiting hat imports. The jobs and income of British
citizens took precedence over monetary benefits received by
colonists (although the largest percentage of colonists at
this time were also British, including human Scotch/Irish,
German, and French exports to the New World who were expected
to abide by rules of the crown).
When we
piece together some of these little tidbits of history, we
begin to see a pattern - one that plays itself out in world
trade today. Although international trade is now much more
elaborate and complicated, each exported product or service
is - hopefully - countered with an equally valued import.
Next week we'll move into the nineteenth century to discover
why the colonies decided to strike out on their own, and how
the product/service market changed on a global scale during
the 1800s.
Until
then,
Linda Goin
|